Company claims Oklahoma judge miscalculated opioid award

FILE - In this Aug. 26, 2019 file photo, Judge Thad Balkman reads a summary of his decision in the opioid trial at the Cleveland County Courthouse in Norman, Okla. Balkman ruled in favor of the state of Oklahoma and ordered Johnson and Johnson to pay $572 million to a plan to abate the opioid crisis. Balkman made a $107 million miscalculation when he ordered consumer products giant Johnson & Johnson to pay $572 million to help clean up the state's opioid crisis, attorneys for the company argue in a court filing. (Chris Landsberger/The Oklahoman via AP, Pool)

OKLAHOMA CITY — An Oklahoma judge made a $107 million miscalculation when he ordered consumer products giant Johnson & Johnson to pay $572 million to help clean up the state’s opioid crisis, attorneys for the company argue in a court filing.

The company also is asking for a reduction in the judgment based on pre-trial settlements totaling $355 million that the state reached with Oxycontin-maker Purdue Pharma and Israeli-owned Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

The company has separately appealed the court’s ruling to the Oklahoma Supreme Court, arguing that Cleveland County District Judge Thad Balkman’s ruling was an unprecedented interpretation of the state’s public nuisance law.

A spokesman for Attorney General Mike Hunter declined to comment on the filing.

“Given the pending matter both before Judge Balkman and the Supreme Court, we aren’t going to comment outside of what has been filed with the courts at this time,” said spokesman Alex Gerszewski.

Johnson & Johnson maintains the miscalculation resulted in the amount the judge awarded for the costs to the state for developing and disseminating information on treating babies born addicted to opioids. The cost of these services should have been about $107,000, not $107 million, attorneys wrote.

“No evidence supports this higher amount, which appears simply to reflect a mistaken addition of three zeros to the calculation of the annual average, yet the state’s proposed judgment fails to account for this discrepancy,” the filing states.

The company’s request for a reduced award was outlined in its response to the state’s proposed final judgment. In that proposal, the state asks the court to immediately order the company to pay the entire $572 million award to its attorneys. The state also maintains the court could order the company to pay even more to abate the opioid crisis in future years.

___

Follow Sean Murphy at www.twitter.com/apseanmurphy

You may also interested in

Rural church among those providing aid after Louisiana flood

Aug 21, 2016

Rural church among those providing aid, including food and prayer services, after Louisiana flood

Valeant, attempting to normalize operations, names new CFO

Aug 22, 2016

Valeant Pharmaceuticals is replacing Robert Rosiello as chief financial officer as the embattled pharmaceutical company attempts to normalize operations amid a host of ongoing investigations and class action suits

Some vacation spots quietly benefit as travelers avoid Zika

Aug 23, 2016

Zika fears are leading some to book away from the Caribbean and Florida

People also read these

Self-driving cars go public; Uber offers rides in Pittsburgh

Aug 18, 2016

The option to hail a ride in a self-driving car will soon be available to Uber users in Pittsburgh

AP NewsBreak: Feds want to ban swimming with Hawaii dolphins

Aug 24, 2016

Federal regulators are proposing a ban on swimming with dolphins in Hawaii

US wants to force lower speeds on truck and bus drivers

Aug 26, 2016

The U.S. wants to forcibly limit how fast trucks, buses and other large vehicles can drive on the nation's highways

Emporium Post fulfils the need to know all things about consumers and how businesses can take this opportunity to reach their own customers.

Contact us: sales@emporiumpost.com

Join our mailing list now!